This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (house debate) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2006-10-24 10:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Lib.)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"214328\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Speaker, the member is like most members, and obviously everyone in here is busy trying to do the best job possible for their constituents. I would like to ask the member a question. I think he has to help the House understand the fundamental question. There are provisional orders and the question is whether or not they become permanent. If they do not, if there is no appetite for these provisional orders to become a permanent part of our Standing Orders, then we will have some consequences. It means that certain things we have been utilizing for some time now will be pulled off. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"214329\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would like to get an idea from the government whip as to whether or not there is a plan to make the necessary proposals to reinstitute or to make recommendations for changes to the Standing Orders that would take into account some of those provisional orders, but I am more interested in which of these provisional orders the government would not be supportive of instating into the Standing Orders permanently.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"214328\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le Pr\u00e9sident, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 est comme la plupart d'entre nous. Bien s\u00fbr, chacun ici cherche \u00e0 faire le meilleur travail possible pour ses \u00e9lecteurs. J'ai une question pour le d\u00e9put\u00e9. Je pense qu'il doit aider la Chambre \u00e0 comprendre la question fondamentale. Il y a des articles provisoires du R\u00e8glement, et il s'agit de savoir s'ils devraient, ou non, devenir permanents. Si nous d\u00e9cidons que nous ne voulons pas que ces articles provisoires soient int\u00e9gr\u00e9s de fa\u00e7on permanente dans notre R\u00e8glement, il faudra accepter les cons\u00e9quences. Certaines dispositions que nous utilisons maintenant depuis un certain temps seront abolies.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"214329\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'aimerais que le whip du gouvernement nous dise s'il existe un plan visant \u00e0 r\u00e9tablir le R\u00e8glement, ou \u00e0 recommander l'int\u00e9gration de certains des articles provisoires au R\u00e8glement. Ce qui m'int\u00e9resse par-dessus tout, c'est de savoir quels articles le gouvernement pr\u00e9f\u00e9rerait ne pas int\u00e9grer de fa\u00e7on permanente \u00e0 notre R\u00e8glement.</p>"
},
"url": "/debates/2006/10/24/paul-szabo-2/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/paul-szabo/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/3198/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "1715834",
"h1": {
"en": "Routine Proceedings",
"fr": ""
},
"h2": {
"en": "Committees of the House",
"fr": ""
},
"h3": {
"en": "Procedure and House Affairs",
"fr": ""
},
"document_url": "/debates/2006/10/24/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fdebates%2F2006%2F10%2F24%2F"
}
}