This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2012-05-03 10:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Stephen Quick",
"fr": "M. Stephen Quick"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2852827\" data-originallang=\"en\">The other thing is that in any innovation, it's that pull-push. It has to be a perfect storm. If you take the jetliner, the Korean War comes along and it doesn't have the market that it needs. But you take the regional jet.... Before the regional jet, de Havilland U.K. tried the same sort of thing, but there was no market for it so it flopped. It was the perfect storm. The CRJ came along at the right time. If I take the Q400s coming out of Toronto, years ago turboprops were not the way to go. The consumer again wants to go fast. They want to get there soon, and they want to get there in comfort, so taking a jet, climbing up, getting above the turbulence, and then coming down takes a lot of fuel. It's not as efficient. Jet engines are efficient up top, but then there's less turbulence, so the consumer likes it.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2852827\" data-originallang=\"en\">L\u2019autre aspect, c\u2019est que par rapport \u00e0 toute innovation, il y a les forces de pouss\u00e9e et d'attraction. Les circonstances doivent \u00eatre parfaites. Dans le cas de l\u2019avion de ligne, la guerre de Cor\u00e9e a \u00e9clat\u00e9 et le march\u00e9 n\u2019existait plus pour ce produit. Tandis que pour le jet r\u00e9gional... Avant le jet r\u00e9gional, la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 de Havilland du Royaume-Uni a tent\u00e9 le m\u00eame genre de choses, mais il n\u2019y avait pas de march\u00e9 et ce fut un \u00e9chec. Il s'agissait des pires conditions qui soient. Le CRJ est arriv\u00e9 au bon moment. Prenons l\u2019exemple des Q400, \u00e0 Toronto. Il y a quelques ann\u00e9es, l\u2019avion \u00e0 turbopropulseurs n\u2019\u00e9tait pas la voie \u00e0 suivre. Le consommateur veut de nouveau voyager rapidement. Les gens veulent arriver \u00e0 destination rapidement, et ils veulent du confort. Donc, voyager en jet, grimper au-dessus de la turbulence, puis descendre, cela consomme beaucoup de carburant. Ce n\u2019est pas aussi efficace. Les turbor\u00e9acteurs sont efficaces l\u00e0-haut, mais il y a moins de turbulence; donc, le consommateur aime cela.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/transport/41-1/34/stephen-quick-6/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "7555980",
"document_url": "/committees/transport/41-1/34/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ftransport%2F41-1%2F34%2F"
}
}