Speech (committee meeting)

{
    "time": "2007-02-07 15:45:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Brian Jean",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"432341\" data-originallang=\"en\">There's no partisanship, of course not.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432342\" data-originallang=\"en\">So think about the motive from this side of the table. We'd be happy to bring this forward, but I want to be clear. They're not going to comment on the business relationship--that's my understanding--and it's not about the security itself; it's not about what steps have been taken, but about the particular incident that took place that day, and if this goes forward, that's not an issue. I just think it's going to be, quite frankly, a waste of time for the committee, except from a general context. We've already supported the motion in relation to Montreal, and we're supporting the motion to deal with railway safety and the motion to deal with airport security in a general context, but we've got a specific incident that took place here, and an ongoing investigation. My understanding is that they're not going to comment on an ongoing investigation because they can't, because it would compromise the situation of the investigation. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432343\" data-originallang=\"en\">I don't know how long it takes to do an investigation, but I've seen how fast these matters have moved under the Liberal government, and I think this is a very speedy process so far. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432344\" data-originallang=\"en\">The situation is this. If you want to pass the motion, feel free to pass it. I don't think it's going to be constructive. I would suggest that we put it in with the issue of Montreal or some other issue at the same time. </p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"432341\" data-originallang=\"en\">Non, bien s\u00fbr que non.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432342\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pensez donc aux motifs des d\u00e9put\u00e9s de ce c\u00f4t\u00e9. Nous serions ravis d'adopter cette mesure, mais je tiens \u00e0 \u00eatre clair. Ils ne diront rien sur la relation d'affaire, d'apr\u00e8s ce que je comprends, et il ne s'agit pas de la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 elle-m\u00eame, il ne s'agit pas des mesures qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 prises, mais de l'incident pr\u00e9cis qui a eu lieu ce jour-l\u00e0, et si cette motion suit son cours, ce ne sera pas un probl\u00e8me. Je pense seulement que ce sera une perte de temps pour le comit\u00e9, sauf d'un point de vue g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 appuy\u00e9 la motion sur Montr\u00e9al et nous appuyons la motion sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 ferroviaire, ainsi que celle sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 a\u00e9roportuaire dans un contexte g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, mais il y a un incident particulier qui a eu lieu l\u00e0 et qui fait toujours l'objet d'une enqu\u00eate. Je ne pense pas qu'ils vont se prononcer sur une enqu\u00eate qui n'est pas termin\u00e9e, parce qu'ils ne le peuvent pas, parce que cela compromettrait l'enqu\u00eate. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432343\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je ne sais pas combien de temps il faut pour r\u00e9aliser une enqu\u00eate, mais j'ai vu \u00e0 quelle vitesse elles \u00e9voluaient sous le r\u00e8gne du gouvernement lib\u00e9ral, et je pense que celle-ci va bon train jusqu'\u00e0 maintenant. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"432344\" data-originallang=\"en\">Voici la situation: si vous voulez adopter cette motion, sentez-vous libre de le faire. Je ne pense pas que ce sera constructif. Je proposerais que nous combinions cette \u00e9tude \u00e0 celle de Montr\u00e9al ou \u00e0 une autre. </p>"
    },
    "url": "/committees/transport/39-1/33/brian-jean-3/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/brian-jean/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/450/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "1884422",
    "document_url": "/committees/transport/39-1/33/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ftransport%2F39-1%2F33%2F"
    }
}