This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-10-25 17:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. James Smith",
"fr": "M. James Smith"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7396951\" data-originallang=\"en\">We do have the maintenance. Currently we do monitor who is shooting and whether they're still active and they have to go. I wouldn't see any problem if we had to do something in the regulations that monitored that in order to keep our sport in existence. Maybe the CFOs would be involved. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7396952\" data-originallang=\"en\">In the Australian model, they've totally banned handguns, but IPSC is still a sport there. They do a preliminary licensing there. In order to introduce new people to the sport, they require you to do six months under a preliminary licence. Then you're fully licensed and you move on to being a full member and you're allowed to acquire a handgun. Through the regulations, I think we could come to some kind of terms. I don't know if it needs to be written right into the bill. Some of the discussions I've had with some of the members of this committee have included suggestions that those details be worked out at the regulation level.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7396951\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous exigeons que les membres demeurent en r\u00e8gle. \u00c0 l'heure actuelle, nous surveillons effectivement qui vient tirer et d\u00e9terminons si ces personnes sont encore actives et si elles doivent partir. Je ne verrais pas de probl\u00e8me si nous devions inscrire quelque chose dans le r\u00e8glement pour surveiller cela et maintenir notre sport en vie. Peut-\u00eatre que les contr\u00f4leurs des armes \u00e0 feu seraient des parties prenantes. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7396952\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans le mod\u00e8le australien, les armes de poing sont absolument interdites, mais le tir sportif existe encore \u00e0 l'IPSC. Il faut obtenir un permis provisoire. Pour initier de nouvelles personnes au sport, il faut six mois en vertu d'un permis provisoire. Ensuite, vous obtenez un permis complet, vous devenez membre \u00e0 part enti\u00e8re et vous \u00eates autoris\u00e9 \u00e0 acqu\u00e9rir une arme de poing. Je pense que nous pourrions, par le biais de la r\u00e9glementation, trouver des modalit\u00e9s. Je ne sais pas s'il faut l'inscrire directement dans le projet de loi. J'ai eu des discussions avec certains des membres du Comit\u00e9 et ils ont fait des suggestions selon lesquelles ces d\u00e9tails devraient \u00eatre r\u00e9gl\u00e9s au niveau de la r\u00e9glementation.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/public-safety/44-1/41/james-smith-8/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11881296",
"document_url": "/committees/public-safety/44-1/41/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fpublic-safety%2F44-1%2F41%2F"
}
}