This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-01-25 16:15:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Jennifer Oades",
"fr": "Mme Jennifer Oades"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6470809\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would call it a parole officer. That's why there is confusion with this whole.... Maybe the commissioner can come in and help me with this direct supervision model and who's doing what and who's who. The caseworker who came to the parole hearing with the offender was the person who was actively supervising that person. They worked for Maison Painchaud. It wasn't a CSC person or employee who was at that parole hearing.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6470809\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je parlerais d'un agent de lib\u00e9ration conditionnelle. C'est pourquoi il existe une certaine confusion... La commissaire pourrait peut-\u00eatre m'aider concernant ce mod\u00e8le de surveillance directe et le titre et le r\u00f4le de chacun. L'intervenant qui accompagnait le d\u00e9linquant \u00e0 l'audience de lib\u00e9ration conditionnelle \u00e9tait la personne qui le surveillait activement. Cette personne travaillait pour la Maison Painchaud. Ce n'est pas un employ\u00e9 du SCC qui \u00e9tait pr\u00e9sent lors de l'audience.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/public-safety/43-2/13/jennifer-oades-13/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11090565",
"document_url": "/committees/public-safety/43-2/13/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fpublic-safety%2F43-2%2F13%2F"
}
}