This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2011-02-03 09:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Mary Campbell",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2300825\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would just point out that the other provisions of the act continue to apply. If the minister were to deny a case using (l) and using a factor that others considered questionable, the minister would be obligated to provide written reasons to an applicant where a denial is issued. Those reasons would be on the record and of course would then be subject to judicial review if the applicant felt so inclined.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2300825\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vous fais remarquer que les autres dispositions de la loi continuent de s'appliquer. Donc, si le ministre rejetait une demande en invoquant un facteur, en vertu de l'alin\u00e9a <em>l</em>), que d'autres jugeaient douteux, il serait oblig\u00e9 de fournir des motifs \u00e9crits \u00e0 la personne dont la demande aurait \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9e. Ces motifs seraient du domaine public et pourraient ensuite faire l'objet d'un contr\u00f4le judiciaire, si le demandeur estimait qu'un tel contr\u00f4le \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/public-safety/40-3/51/mary-campbell-6/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "3712446",
"document_url": "/committees/public-safety/40-3/51/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fpublic-safety%2F40-3%2F51%2F"
}
}