This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-12-15 17:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Mario Simard (Jonqui\u00e8re, BQ)",
"fr": "M. Mario Simard (Jonqui\u00e8re, BQ)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6894103\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Thank you, Mr. Chair.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6894104\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Mr. Maloney knows that, in the last Parliament, we worked together a lot and it went very well. We have to figure out how to balance effectiveness and collaboration.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6894105\" data-originallang=\"fr\">I don't think it would be appropriate to refer the motion to the subcommittee. It is not restrictive, but fairly broad. There is a strong consensus on the motion, especially among Mr. Angus, Ms. Rempel Garner and myself. Some people have said that what the motion contains was worthwhile. Nothing is stopping us from adopting it today and then figuring out in subcommittee how we could proceed. We could adopt it today so that we could be set and already know how to proceed at future meetings. It is just for the sake of logic and efficiency that I think we should vote on it right away, to then focus on shaping it for the subcommittee. However, we should not refer the motion to the subcommittee, as that would make us lose a huge amount of time. There is consensus for everyone.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6894103\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Merci, monsieur le pr\u00e9sident.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6894104\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Par le pass\u00e9, au cours de la derni\u00e8re l\u00e9gislature, M. Maloney le sait, nous avons beaucoup travaill\u00e9 en collaboration et cela s'est tr\u00e8s bien pass\u00e9. Maintenant, il faut voir comment nous allons concilier efficacit\u00e9 et collaboration.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6894105\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Je ne crois pas qu'il serait pertinent de renvoyer la motion au sous-comit\u00e9. Elle n'est pas restrictive, elle est assez large. Il y a un fort consensus sur la motion, surtout entre M. Angus, Mme Rempel Garner et moi. Certaines personnes se sont exprim\u00e9es en disant que ce qu'il y a dans ladite motion \u00e9tait int\u00e9ressant. Rien ne nous emp\u00eache de l'accepter aujourd'hui et de voir en sous-comit\u00e9, par la suite, comment nous pourrions proc\u00e9der. Nous pourrions l'accepter aujourd'hui, ainsi nous serions fix\u00e9s, nous saurions d\u00e9j\u00e0 comment proc\u00e9der lors de nos prochaines rencontres. C'est simplement par souci de logique et d'efficacit\u00e9 que je crois que nous devrions voter imm\u00e9diatement l\u00e0-dessus pour passer aussit\u00f4t \u00e0 la mani\u00e8re de mettre cela en forme pour le sous-comit\u00e9. Toutefois, nous ne devrions pas renvoyer la motion au sous-comit\u00e9, nous allons perdre un temps \u00e9pouvantable l\u00e0-dessus. Il y a consensus pour tout le monde. </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/natural-resources/44-1/1/mario-simard-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/mario-simard/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4566/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11464972",
"document_url": "/committees/natural-resources/44-1/1/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fnatural-resources%2F44-1%2F1%2F"
}
}