This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2024-04-29 11:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Marilyn Gladu (Sarnia\u2014Lambton, CPC)",
"fr": "Mme Marilyn Gladu (Sarnia\u2014Lambton, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8365226\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Thank you, Chair. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365227\" data-originallang=\"en\">Definitely, I agree with Mr. Fortin that we heard testimonies, numerous testimonies, from teachers who talked about the increase of violence that they're seeing and the importance of retaining section 43. I agree with him that it would be a big mistake to take it out altogether. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365228\" data-originallang=\"en\">In fact, the Supreme Court did quite an excellent job of defining, with clarity, the scope. If we support BQ-1, we can't support CPC-1, which actually is the more fulsome Supreme Court decision put in to clarify.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365229\" data-originallang=\"en\">For that reason, I can't support this, although I do agree that we need to retain section 43 and capture, with clarity, the Supreme Court decision.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8365226\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, madame la pr\u00e9sidente.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365227\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je suis tout \u00e0 fait d'accord avec M. Fortin pour dire que nous avons entendu de nombreux t\u00e9moignages d'enseignants qui ont parl\u00e9 de l'augmentation de la violence qu'ils observent et de l'importance de conserver l'article 43. Je conviens avec lui que ce serait une grave erreur de le supprimer compl\u00e8tement.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365228\" data-originallang=\"en\">En fait, la Cour supr\u00eame a tr\u00e8s bien r\u00e9ussi \u00e0 d\u00e9finir clairement la port\u00e9e. Si nous adoptons l'amendement BQ\u20111, nous ne pourrons pas appuyer l'amendement CPC\u20111, qui tient compte de la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame de fa\u00e7on plus compl\u00e8te pour clarifier les choses.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8365229\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pour cette raison, je ne peux pas appuyer cet amendement, m\u00eame si je conviens que nous devons conserver l'article 43 et reprendre, avec clart\u00e9, la d\u00e9cision de la Cour supr\u00eame.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/justice/44-1/102/marilyn-gladu-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/marilyn-gladu/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4197/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12697160",
"document_url": "/committees/justice/44-1/102/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fjustice%2F44-1%2F102%2F"
}
}