This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-10-24 16:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Randy Boissonnault",
"fr": "M. Randy Boissonnault"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5615245\" data-originallang=\"en\">I do.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615246\" data-originallang=\"en\">LIB-1 amends clause 25. It's a housekeeping item, a word issue in terms of \u201crecognizance\u201d. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615247\" data-originallang=\"en\">If you look at clause 25, we're replacing the term \u201crecognizance\u201d in subsection 83.29(3) of the Criminal Code with the term \u201crelease order\u201d. The document used to bind the witness to appear in court for an investigative hearing under subsection 83.29(3) is not part of the bail regime and should continue to be referred to as \u201crecognizance\u201d. The amendment would remove clause 25 to ensure continued reference to \u201crecognizance\u201d in subsection 83.29(3). </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615248\" data-originallang=\"en\">That's why we're putting forward LIB-1. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5615245\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'ai quelque chose.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615246\" data-originallang=\"en\">L\u2019amendement LIB-1 modifie l\u2019article 25. Il s\u2019agit d\u2019une question d\u2019ordre administratif, un probl\u00e8me de terminologie concernant le mot \u00ab engagement \u00bb. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615247\" data-originallang=\"en\">Si vous regardez l\u2019article 25, nous rempla\u00e7ons le terme \u00ab engagement \u00bb, au paragraphe 83.29(3) du Code criminel, par l'expression \u00ab ordonnance de mise en libert\u00e9 \u00bb. Le document utilis\u00e9 pour contraindre le t\u00e9moin \u00e0 compara\u00eetre devant le tribunal pour une enqu\u00eate en vertu du paragraphe 83.29(3) ne fait pas partie du r\u00e9gime de mise en libert\u00e9 sous caution et devrait continuer d\u2019\u00eatre appel\u00e9 \u00ab engagement \u00bb. L\u2019amendement supprimerait l\u2019article 25 pour assurer le maintien du renvoi \u00e0 un \u00ab engagement \u00bb au paragraphe 83.29(3).</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5615248\" data-originallang=\"en\">C\u2019est pourquoi nous proposons l\u2019amendement LIB-1.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/justice/42-1/113/randy-boissonnault-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/randy-boissonnault/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4392/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10327568",
"document_url": "/committees/justice/42-1/113/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fjustice%2F42-1%2F113%2F"
}
}