This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2023-11-02 16:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Sam Andrey",
"fr": "M. Sam Andrey"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8030093\" data-originallang=\"en\">Sure. I would be delighted. We think a lot about misinformation and online harm. The government has been considering legislation on online safety for a while and been consulting about it. We're urging that it move forward. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030094\" data-originallang=\"en\">We were surprised, but I think pleasantly surprised, that the AI act now would be a potential vehicle to address some of the harms of content recommendation systems, or \u201csocial media\u201d, as most people refer to it. It was in <a data-HoCid=\"271243\" href=\"/politicians/francois-philippe-champagne/\" title=\"Fran\u00e7ois-Philippe Champagne\">Minister Champagne</a>'s list. If the online safety legislation doesn't move forward, or if it really focuses heavily on content like child sexual exploitation and terrorist content more specifically, then I think this could be a vehicle in which we attempt to regulate the recommendation systems and their algorithmic amplification for potential harm. I think it's a good example of the type of thing that will take time to do correctly through the regulatory process, but I think it is a potential way.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030095\" data-originallang=\"en\">Specifically on the generative AI component of it, in the voluntary code that was referenced, there's a proposed requirement for what's called watermarking. It's basically people being able to detect that it's a manipulated image or video or a deepfake. Especially as generative AI improves and our ability to trust anything we're seeing with our eyes breaks down, that type of technical and regulatory response will be very important.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030096\" data-originallang=\"en\">That's just an example of how we can use this bill. I think that is very important.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8030093\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Bien s\u00fbr. J'en serais ravi. Nous r\u00e9fl\u00e9chissons \u00e9norm\u00e9ment \u00e0 la d\u00e9sinformation et aux pr\u00e9judices en ligne. Le gouvernement envisage une loi sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 en ligne depuis un certain temps et m\u00e8ne des consultations \u00e0 ce sujet. Nous vous prions d'aller de l'avant.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030094\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Nous avons \u00e9t\u00e9 surpris, mais agr\u00e9ablement surpris, je pense, que la Loi sur l\u2019IA serait d\u00e9sormais un v\u00e9hicule potentiel pour rem\u00e9dier \u00e0 certains des pr\u00e9judices caus\u00e9s par les syst\u00e8mes de recommandation de contenu, ou, comme la plupart des gens les appellent, les \u00ab m\u00e9dias sociaux \u00bb. C'\u00e9tait dans la liste du <a data-HoCid=\"271243\" href=\"/politicians/francois-philippe-champagne/\" title=\"Fran\u00e7ois-Philippe Champagne\">ministre Champagne</a>. Si une loi sur la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 en ligne ne va pas de l'avant, ou si elle est fortement ax\u00e9e sur du contenu comme l\u2019exploitation sexuelle d\u2019enfants ou du contenu terroriste, alors je pense qu'elle pourrait servir de v\u00e9hicule pour tenter de r\u00e9glementer les syst\u00e8mes de recommandation de contenu et leur amplification algorithmique en mati\u00e8re de pr\u00e9judices potentiels. C'est un bon exemple du genre de choses qui, selon moi, prendront du temps \u00e0 faire correctement dans le cadre du processus r\u00e9glementaire, mais je pense que nous pourrions proc\u00e9der ainsi.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030095\" data-originallang=\"en\"> En ce qui concerne l'aspect de l\u2019IA g\u00e9n\u00e9rative, dans le code volontaire que l'on a mentionn\u00e9, on propose une exigence pour ce qu'on appelle le tatouage num\u00e9rique. C'est-\u00e0-dire que les gens doivent simplement \u00eatre en mesure de distinguer s'il s'agit d'une image ou d'une vid\u00e9o modifi\u00e9e ou d'un hypertrucage. \u00c0 mesure que l'IA g\u00e9n\u00e9rative s'am\u00e9liore et que notre capacit\u00e9 d'avoir confiance en tout ce que nous voyons s'effondre, ce type de r\u00e9ponse technique et r\u00e9glementaire sera tr\u00e8s important.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8030096\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Ce n'est que l'une des fa\u00e7ons dont nous pouvons utiliser ce projet de loi. Je pense que c'est tr\u00e8s important.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/industry/44-1/94/sam-andrey-5/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12419144",
"document_url": "/committees/industry/44-1/94/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Findustry%2F44-1%2F94%2F"
}
}