This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2023-10-24 17:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7994564\" data-originallang=\"en\">I think on the aspect of risk, it's a bit of both. Currently, PIPEDA is principles-based\u2014there are some rules, but rules are few. CPPA would certainly keep principles but adopt many more rules. I think an effective system has both principles and rules that are at a sufficient level of generality that they can still be relevant even if the technology or the business context changes over time.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7994565\" data-originallang=\"en\">I think where I would disagree with my colleague Mr. Fraser is that PIPEDA lacked the rules that would ensure protection. I'm not suggesting a prescriptive statute, but I'm suggesting a statute that has both principles and actual rules stated at the right level of generality.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7994564\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Je pense qu'en ce qui concerne le risque, il s'agit un peu des deux. \u00c0 l'heure actuelle, la LPRPDE est fond\u00e9e sur des principes \u2014 il y a quelques r\u00e8gles, mais elles sont peu nombreuses. Dans le cadre de la Loi sur la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e des consommateurs, on conserverait certainement les principes, mais on adopterait beaucoup plus de r\u00e8gles. Je pense qu'un syst\u00e8me efficace comporte \u00e0 la fois des r\u00e8gles et des principes qui sont suffisamment g\u00e9n\u00e9raux pour demeurer pertinents m\u00eame si la technologie ou le contexte d'affaires change au fil du temps.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7994565\" data-originallang=\"en\">L\u00e0 o\u00f9 je ne suis pas d'accord avec mon coll\u00e8gue, M. Fraser, c'est que la LPRPDE n'a pas les r\u00e8gles n\u00e9cessaires pour assurer la protection. Je ne parle pas d'une loi prescriptive, mais d'une loi qui comporte \u00e0 la fois des r\u00e8gles et des principes \u00e9nonc\u00e9s de mani\u00e8re suffisamment g\u00e9n\u00e9rale.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/industry/44-1/91/daniel-therrien-33/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12389449",
"document_url": "/committees/industry/44-1/91/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Findustry%2F44-1%2F91%2F"
}
}