This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-02-02 11:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Hon. Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill, CPC)",
"fr": "L\u2019hon. Michelle Rempel Garner (Calgary Nose Hill, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6491766\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thank you, Madam Chair.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491767\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'll direct my questions to Mr. Stewart. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491768\" data-originallang=\"en\">My understanding is that the Novavax purchase agreement was originally announced on August 31, 2020. I'm looking at an email that was produced in documents that were released to the health committee on Friday. The email is between Bryan Blom, who was the director of communications for Public Works, I believe, and Cecely Roy, who is a press secretary at Public Works. It's an email that's going through various iterations of the press release related to the Novavax purchase agreement announcement. Mr. Blom says, \u201cHi Cecely - Removed reference to NRC component of Novavax MOU.\u201d</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491769\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I'm just wondering, as you were the head of the NRC at that point in time, why the NRC pulled out of a production deal in August or why that reference was removed. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6491766\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, madame la pr\u00e9sidente.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491767\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais adresser mes questions \u00e0 M. Stewart. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491768\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je crois savoir que la convention d\u2019achat de Novavax a \u00e9t\u00e9 annonc\u00e9e le 31 ao\u00fbt 2020. Je regarde un courriel qui fait partie des documents remis au Comit\u00e9 de la sant\u00e9 vendredi. C'est un \u00e9change entre Bryan Blom, alors directeur des communications \u00e0 Travaux publics, je crois, et Cecely Roy, attach\u00e9e de presse \u00e0 Travaux publics. Dans cette cha\u00eene de courriels, les deux reviennent sur les diff\u00e9rentes versions du communiqu\u00e9 de presse concernant l\u2019annonce de la convention d\u2019achat de Novavax. M. Blom annonce \u00e0 Mme Roy, apr\u00e8s les salutations d'usage, que la mention de la composante du CNRC du PE de Novavax a \u00e9t\u00e9 retir\u00e9e.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6491769\" data-originallang=\"en\">Puisque vous \u00e9tiez \u00e0 la t\u00eate du CNRC \u00e0 ce moment-l\u00e0, pouvez-vous me dire pourquoi le CNRC s\u2019est retir\u00e9 d\u2019une entente de production en ao\u00fbt ou pourquoi la mention du CNRC a \u00e9t\u00e9 supprim\u00e9e. </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/industry/43-2/14/michelle-rempel-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/michelle-rempel/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4385/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11109991",
"document_url": "/committees/industry/43-2/14/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Findustry%2F43-2%2F14%2F"
}
}