This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-02-26 16:00:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Pierre Parent",
"fr": "M. Pierre Parent"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5292972\" data-originallang=\"en\">With regard to this, the policy right now says \u201cthe member\u201d because we really wanted the member, as the employer, to have the first responsibility, then the whip, and then the CHRO. Everywhere in the policy there's always the possibility of the complaint being handled by one of the three elements.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5292973\" data-originallang=\"en\">I would act as the independent person mostly for process. Let's say a complaint is filed with my office, and I retain an investigator, the investigator would be independent. Basically, it would not be investigated by the party; it would be investigated by the third-party investigator. The report would be delivered, as is, to the whip, so the whip would have to make.... But the findings of harassment or not would be totally independent at this point, even in the current context.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5292972\" data-originallang=\"en\">\u00c0 cet \u00e9gard, s'il est \u00e9crit \u00ab d\u00e9put\u00e9 \u00bb dans la politique, c'est parce que nous voulions vraiment que le d\u00e9put\u00e9, en tant qu'employeur, soit le premier responsable, suivi du whip et ensuite du DPRH. Selon la politique, il est toujours possible que la plainte soit trait\u00e9e par l'un des trois \u00e9l\u00e9ments.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5292973\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'agirais \u00e0 titre d'ind\u00e9pendant. Si une plainte est d\u00e9pos\u00e9e aupr\u00e8s de mon bureau et que j'engage un enqu\u00eateur, celui-ci est ind\u00e9pendant. Essentiellement, ce n'est pas le parti qui m\u00e8ne l'enqu\u00eate, mais bien l'enqu\u00eateur tiers. Le rapport est remis, tel quel, au whip, de sorte que le whip... Or, les conclusions quant \u00e0 savoir si la plainte de harc\u00e8lement est fond\u00e9e ou non seraient tir\u00e9es de fa\u00e7on compl\u00e8tement ind\u00e9pendante, m\u00eame dans le contexte actuel.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/human-resources/42-1/89/pierre-parent-7/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9986905",
"document_url": "/committees/human-resources/42-1/89/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fhuman-resources%2F42-1%2F89%2F"
}
}