This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2023-06-13 20:10:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Ruby Sahota",
"fr": "Mme Ruby Sahota"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7899633\" data-originallang=\"en\">That's very helpful. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899634\" data-originallang=\"en\">In this instance, when it comes to Mr. O'Toole's briefing, did you suspect, or did you know? What was he briefed on? </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899635\" data-originallang=\"en\">We know what he understood, and then I think this is exactly why.... For all of us, it is educational as to how these briefings should be provided and how it should be explained to members of Parliament why you believe certain intel to be so; or maybe it's an absolute evidence that, ah ha, we have backup to prove that this is where it's coming from. Based on the testimony that we've received from Mr. Chong, the briefings that were given to him were at a very high level. There wasn't a clear understanding or a clear picture of what was explained to him in some of the briefings he had received before the news reports came out. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899636\" data-originallang=\"en\">In the case of Mr. O'Toole, we know what he believes, but did CSIS inform him that it believed that was the origin of the information, or was he informed that you had evidence, solid evidence that this was where it was coming from? Therefore, could David Johnston's conclusion, in your opinion, still be correct?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7899633\" data-originallang=\"en\">C'est tr\u00e8s utile.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899634\" data-originallang=\"en\">En ce qui concerne la s\u00e9ance d'information que M. O'Toole a re\u00e7ue, aviez-vous des soup\u00e7ons? Est\u2011ce que vous saviez? De quoi a\u2011t\u2011il \u00e9t\u00e9 inform\u00e9?</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899635\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous savons ce qu'il a compris, et je pense que c'est exactement pour cela que... C'est tr\u00e8s \u00e9difiant pour nous tous d'apprendre la fa\u00e7on dont ces r\u00e9unions d'information devraient \u00eatre offertes et dont il faudrait expliquer aux d\u00e9put\u00e9s ce qui justifie le statut que vous attribuez \u00e0 certains renseignements; vous avez peut-\u00eatre une preuve absolue qui d\u00e9montre que c'est de l\u00e0 que cela vient. D'apr\u00e8s le t\u00e9moignage de M. Chong, l'information qui lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 donn\u00e9e \u00e9tait d'un niveau tr\u00e8s \u00e9lev\u00e9. Ce qui lui a \u00e9t\u00e9 expliqu\u00e9 n'\u00e9tait pas clair, lors de certaines s\u00e9ances d'information qu'il a eues avant que la nouvelle soit rapport\u00e9e par les m\u00e9dias.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7899636\" data-originallang=\"en\">Dans le cas de M. O'Toole, nous savons ce qu'il croit, mais le SCRS lui a\u2011t\u2011il dit croire que c'\u00e9tait l\u00e0 l'origine de l'information? Est\u2011ce qu'on a dit \u00e0 M. O'Toole que vous aviez des preuves vraiment solides que c'\u00e9tait l\u00e0 l'origine de l'information? Par cons\u00e9quent, estimez-vous que les conclusions de David Johnston sont toujours correctes?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/house-affairs/44-1/83/ruby-sahota-7/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/ruby-sahota/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4209/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "12290291",
"document_url": "/committees/house-affairs/44-1/83/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fhouse-affairs%2F44-1%2F83%2F"
}
}