This is a single speech (committee meeting) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2012-10-30 09:20:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Paul Dewar",
        "fr": "M. Paul Dewar"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3044362\" data-originallang=\"en\">You will be happy to note, Mr. Chair, that this doesn't require a long explanation. It is simply to amend the legislation so that there will be a review within five years. This is common practice. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3044363\" data-originallang=\"en\">In light of the fact that there are so many changes happening environmentally, there's a lot of concern around any legislation that has to do with environmental impact, as Mr. Dechert has mentioned. In keeping with the kind of accountability that is required in legislation, there should be a review in five years, so that we can look at all the things we discussed in committee around potential loopholes or not and ways in which this could be strengthened, if need be, by government. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3044364\" data-originallang=\"en\">Simply put, it's in keeping with a process of accountability to have a look at it in five years, which is reasonable. I've certainly been on committees where we've passed legislation that's reviewed in three years. It's a change to the act, so that it would be reviewed in five years.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3044362\" data-originallang=\"en\">Vous serez heureux d'apprendre, monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, que je n'aurai pas besoin de me lancer dans une longue explication. L'amendement vise tout simplement \u00e0 modifier le projet de loi pour qu'il y ait un examen apr\u00e8s cinq ans. C'est une pratique courante. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3044363\" data-originallang=\"en\">\u00c9tant donn\u00e9 les nombreux changements que subit l'environnement, on porte un grand int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 toute mesure l\u00e9gislative qui parle de r\u00e9percussions environnementales, comme M. Dechert l'a dit. Conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 l'obligation de rendre des comptes qui est pr\u00e9vue dans la loi, il faudrait mener un examen au bout de cinq ans, de sorte que nous puissions \u00e9tudier tous les points dont nous avons discut\u00e9 au comit\u00e9, notamment les \u00e9chappatoires possibles et les fa\u00e7ons dont le gouvernement pourrait, au besoin, renforcer la loi. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3044364\" data-originallang=\"en\">Disons simplement que cette exigence correspond \u00e0 un processus de reddition de comptes qui pr\u00e9voit un examen au bout de cinq ans, ce qui est raisonnable. Sachez que j'ai si\u00e9g\u00e9 \u00e0 des comit\u00e9s o\u00f9 on a adopt\u00e9 des mesures l\u00e9gislatives imposant un examen apr\u00e8s trois ans. Le changement propos\u00e9 vise \u00e0 faire en sorte que la loi soit revue apr\u00e8s cinq ans. </p>"
    },
    "url": "/committees/foreign-affairs/41-1/52/paul-dewar-12/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/paul-dewar/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/396/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "7748764",
    "document_url": "/committees/foreign-affairs/41-1/52/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fforeign-affairs%2F41-1%2F52%2F"
    }
}