This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2022-05-05 13:10:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Brendan Hanley (Yukon, Lib.)",
"fr": "M. Brendan Hanley (Yukon, Lib.)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"7151372\" data-originallang=\"en\">My thanks to Mr. Reynolds and the rest of the fascinating witnesses. To think that six months ago I wouldn't have been able to tell you what a pinniped was.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151373\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Chair, I will be sharing my time with Ms. May, so I'll have two and a half minutes.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151374\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I want to go back to Mr. Oldford. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151375\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thanks for being here. I notice in your profile that your research interests include parameter estimation, uncertainty analysis and modelling ecological networks. It seems that one of the linchpins for how science in DFO gets translated into options and recommendations is through this scientific advice report. But where you have varying quality of science and uncertain data, I wonder if you can describe some of the challenges in collating uncertainties and inconsistencies into advice based on science, and how you would use the tools such as uncertainty analysis and parameter estimation to inform that advice.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"7151372\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci \u00e0 M. Reynolds et \u00e0 tous nos autres t\u00e9moins fascinants. Quand on pense qu'il y a six mois, je n'aurais pas su vous dire ce qu'est un pinnip\u00e8de.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151373\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, je partagerai mon temps de parole avec Mme May, j'aurais donc deux minutes et demie.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151374\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je veux revenir \u00e0 M. Oldford.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"7151375\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci d'\u00eatre ici. Je remarque dans votre biographie que vos int\u00e9r\u00eats de recherche comprennent l'estimation des param\u00e8tres, l'analyse des incertitudes et la mod\u00e9lisation des r\u00e9seaux \u00e9cologiques. Il semble que ce rapport d'avis scientifiques soit l'une des cl\u00e9s de vo\u00fbte de la conversion des donn\u00e9es scientifiques du MPO en options et en recommandations. Toutefois, comme la qualit\u00e9 de la science varie et que les donn\u00e9es sont incertaines, je me demande si vous pouvez d\u00e9crire certains d\u00e9fis que pose la compilation des incertitudes et des incoh\u00e9rences dans des avis fond\u00e9s sur la science, et comment vous utiliseriez des outils comme l'analyse d'incertitudes et l'estimation des param\u00e8tres pour \u00e9clairer ces avis.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/fisheries/44-1/21/brendan-hanley-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/brendan-hanley/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4603/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11661846",
"document_url": "/committees/fisheries/44-1/21/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffisheries%2F44-1%2F21%2F"
}
}