This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2006-12-07 12:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Randy Kamp (Pitt Meadows\u2014Maple Ridge\u2014Mission, CPC)",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"388758\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thank you, Dr. Rangeley. Maybe another time I could try to explain to you why we took the position we did on that, but I won't try to do that here.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"388759\" data-originallang=\"en\">There are just a couple of areas on which I'd like a little more clarification.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"388760\" data-originallang=\"en\">If we had 10% of our ocean area in MPAs, and let's say we had met our target by 2012, does your organization have any calculation on how much less fishing would be taking place by Canadian interests, let's say? I think I've heard you say both things, that industry is going to love it because there will be recovery of stocks. But are they actually going to fish less? Are there going to be all kinds of areas now where no fishing is allowed and fishermen are going to be affected by this? I'm not saying whether that's a good thing or a bad thing. I just want to know if, in your opinion, they will be.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"388758\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, monsieur Rangeley. Une autre fois peut-\u00eatre je pourrai vous expliquer pourquoi nous avons adopt\u00e9 cette position dans ce dossier, mais je ne vais pas essayer de le faire maintenant.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"388759\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'aimerais avoir des pr\u00e9cisions sur deux points.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"388760\" data-originallang=\"en\">Votre organisation a-t-elle calcul\u00e9 l'effet que pourrait avoir sur les p\u00eaches canadiennes le fait de r\u00e9server 10 p. 100 de nos zones oc\u00e9aniques \u00e0 des ZPM, conform\u00e9ment \u00e0 notre objectif de 2012? Je crois vous avoir entendu dire deux choses \u00e0 ce sujet: d'abord que l'industrie va adorer cette formule parce que les stocks se r\u00e9tabliront, mais aussi qu'elle devra p\u00eacher moins. Ne va-t-elle pas devoir composer avec toutes sortes de secteurs o\u00f9 la p\u00eache sera interdite, ce qui aura des effets n\u00e9gatifs sur les p\u00eacheurs? Je ne veux pas savoir si c'est bon ou mauvais. Je veux simplement savoir si, selon vous, c'est ce qui va se produire.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/fisheries/39-1/32/randy-kamp-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/randy-kamp/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/454/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "1826635",
"document_url": "/committees/fisheries/39-1/32/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffisheries%2F39-1%2F32%2F"
}
}