This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2024-12-10 17:05:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Julie Dzerowicz",
"fr": "Mme Julie Dzerowicz"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8801021\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'm going to be very honest, Mr. Chair, because I don't want in any way not to be dealing with the 106(4) request today. I want to put that out there right now.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8801022\" data-originallang=\"en\">The reason I raised this question of privilege is that I thought you were going to say, \u201cI will take it away and then I will come back to you at the next meeting and rule on this particular matter.\u201d That's what I expected you to do. You were highly efficient with our clerk in coming back with a ruling so quickly, but what I don't want to do at this moment is hinder our conversation about the 106(4) request. I just wanted to mention that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8801023\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Is there a way\u2014I'm just asking this as a question\u2014for us to adjourn the debate on this right now, shift over to the 106(4) request and then come back to it at the next appropriate moment?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8801021\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais \u00eatre tr\u00e8s honn\u00eate avec vous, monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, car je ne veux en aucun cas que nous n\u00e9gligions de traiter la demande en vertu de l'article 106(4) du R\u00e8glement aujourd'hui. Je tiens \u00e0 le mentionner tout de suite.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8801022\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'ai soulev\u00e9 cette question de privil\u00e8ge, parce que je pensais que vous alliez nous dire que vous alliez \u00e9tudier la question et statuer sur elle pendant la prochaine r\u00e9union. C'est ce que je m'attendais \u00e0 ce que vous fassiez. En collaboration avec notre greffier, vous avez fait preuve d'une grande efficacit\u00e9 en revenant avec une d\u00e9cision aussi rapidement, mais ce que je ne veux pas faire en ce moment, c'est entraver notre discussion sur la demande en vertu de l'article 106(4) du R\u00e8glement. Je tenais juste \u00e0 le mentionner.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"8801023\" data-originallang=\"en\">Y a-t-il un moyen \u2014 et je pose simplement la question \u2014 d'ajourner maintenant le d\u00e9bat sur cette question de privil\u00e8ge, de passer \u00e0 la demande en vertu de l'article 106(4) du R\u00e8glement et de revenir \u00e0 la question de privil\u00e8ge au moment opportun?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/44-1/170/julie-dzerowicz-4/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/julie-dzerowicz/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4292/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "13059939",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/44-1/170/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F44-1%2F170%2F"
}
}