This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2020-08-06 11:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Ms. Kate Bahen",
"fr": "Mme Kate Bahen"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6254882\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'm not sure which charity they were doing the due diligence on. Was it WE Charity, or was it WE Charity Foundation? If you look for WE Charity Foundation, it doesn't have a website. It doesn't have financial statements, and it doesn't even have a T3010A. If the government was doing due diligence on the shell foundation, there would be no information. On WE Charity, yes, there was information on its website.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6254882\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je ne sais pas au sujet de quel organisme de bienfaisance ils faisaient preuve de diligence raisonnable. S'agissait-il d'UNIS, ou de la WE Charity Foundation? La WE Charity Foundation n'a pas de site Web. Elle n'a pas d'\u00e9tats financiers, et n'a m\u00eame pas de formulaire T3010A. Si le gouvernement faisait preuve de diligence raisonnable \u00e0 l'\u00e9gard de la fondation fictive, il n'y aurait aucune information. Pour ce qui est de Mouvement UNIS, son site Web contenait de l'information.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/43-1/49/kate-bahen-3/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10921436",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/43-1/49/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F43-1%2F49%2F"
}
}