This is a single speech (committee meeting) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2017-04-12 17:30:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Stephen S. Poloz",
        "fr": "M. Stephen S. Poloz"
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4851176\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Just to be clear, the earlier question posed was that if something bad happened in the Canadian economy, what tools would we use to try to create more employment. The question you're framing, I think, is a little different, so I'll answer it differently.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851177\" data-originallang=\"en\">I think what you want to look for are things that we call the \u201cthird leg\u201d of the policy suite, namely, structural policies. These are policies that are, in effect, intended to enhance the ability of the economy to grow, usually by removing impediments to growth rather than somehow trying to boost them. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851178\" data-originallang=\"en\">A good example would be CETA, and another one would be CFTA. These are explicitly designed to remove impediments to business growth and job creation. As is often the case with structural policies, they are literally free money. It's not as if it costs money to do these things. It's changing rules or adapting programs that already exist so they're more effective.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851179\" data-originallang=\"en\">What happens then is, let's say you do something that enhances the labour force participation of women. That increases the labour input for the economy and the potential output of the economy, giving us more room to grow. That would be a structural policy, not fiscal per se, and certainly not monetary policy.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851180\" data-originallang=\"en\">It can work in much the same way as a free trade agreement works to enhance the ability of the economy to grow on its own. There is no end of examples that one could come up with.</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4851176\" data-originallang=\"en\">Pour que les choses soient bien claires, on nous a demand\u00e9 tout \u00e0 l'heure quels outils nous utiliserions pour essayer de cr\u00e9er de l'emploi en cas de coup dur pour l'\u00e9conomie canadienne. Je crois que votre question est un peu diff\u00e9rente, si bien que ma r\u00e9ponse ne sera pas la m\u00eame.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851177\" data-originallang=\"en\">Selon moi, les mesures que vous envisagez font partie des politiques structurelles, le troisi\u00e8me \u00e9l\u00e9ment de la gamme des m\u00e9canismes possibles. Ces politiques visent en fait \u00e0 am\u00e9liorer les perspectives de croissance \u00e9conomique, le plus souvent en \u00e9liminant les obstacles \u00e0 cette croissance, plut\u00f4t qu'en essayant de la stimuler.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851178\" data-originallang=\"en\">L'Accord \u00e9conomique et commercial global en serait un bon exemple, tout comme l'Accord de libre-\u00e9change canadien. Ces ententes sont con\u00e7ues express\u00e9ment pour supprimer les obstacles \u00e0 la croissance commerciale et \u00e0 la cr\u00e9ation d'emplois. Comme c'est souvent le cas avec les politiques structurelles, il n'y a pas de sommes \u00e0 engager dans l'exercice. Il s'agit plut\u00f4t de modifier les r\u00e8gles ou d'adapter des programmes d\u00e9j\u00e0 existants pour les rendre plus efficaces.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851179\" data-originallang=\"en\">Supposons que vous preniez des mesures pour accro\u00eetre la participation des femmes au march\u00e9 du travail. On augmente ainsi la production de la main-d'oeuvre au sein de l'\u00e9conomie, ce qui am\u00e9liore les perspectives de croissance de la production potentielle. Il s'agirait en pareil cas d'une politique structurelle, et non pas d'une politique budg\u00e9taire, et encore moins d'une politique mon\u00e9taire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4851180\" data-originallang=\"en\">L'effet est un peu le m\u00eame que celui d'un accord de libre-\u00e9change; il s'agit de faire en sorte que l'\u00e9conomie puisse cro\u00eetre par ses propres moyens. Je pourrais vous donner de multiples exemples dans le m\u00eame sens.</p>"
    },
    "url": "/committees/finance/42-1/82/stephen-s-poloz-33/",
    "politician_url": null,
    "politician_membership_url": null,
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "9482180",
    "document_url": "/committees/finance/42-1/82/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F42-1%2F82%2F"
    }
}