This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2014-11-24 16:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3919180\" data-originallang=\"en\">What I'm saying, though, is that I would put the missing person himself or herself in the same position as the relative. There is a provision already that recognizes that the DNA of a relative cannot be used, cannot be matched against criminal indices, presumably on the basis that information is provided for humanitarian purposes. I'm saying the same should go for the DNA of the missing person himself or herself.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3919180\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ce que je veux dire, c'est que je placerais la personne disparue dans la m\u00eame position que le parent. Il existe d\u00e9j\u00e0 une disposition qui pr\u00e9cise que l'ADN d'un proche ne peut \u00eatre utilis\u00e9, ne peut \u00eatre compar\u00e9 \u00e0 des indices criminels, pour le motif pr\u00e9sum\u00e9 que les renseignements sont fournis \u00e0 des fins humanitaires. Le m\u00eame raisonnement doit s'appliquer \u00e0 l'ADN de la personne disparue elle-m\u00eame.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/41-2/60/daniel-therrien-17/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8517792",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/41-2/60/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F41-2%2F60%2F"
}
}