This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2014-10-20 17:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Gerald Keddy",
"fr": "M. Gerald Keddy"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3860562\" data-originallang=\"en\">Along that line, Mr. Orb, maybe I'll lead my question to you a little bit.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3860563\" data-originallang=\"en\"> One of the recommendations you make is that the eligible rate for private contractors for disaster relief should be the going rate. I think we understand that, and that's reasonable. At the same time, you'd like to have gravel that's used\u2014I'm assuming this is municipal gravel owned by the municipality\u2014be a recoverable expense. Again, along that same train of thought, how much of the responsibility needs to come back to almost a P3 look at how we do disaster relief, so that, yes, there's a huge responsibility on behalf of the federal government and we lead in that, but we also have provincial and municipal support, that everyone makes a contribution and therefore, because they have skin in the game, we have stronger and more realistic laws governing how we actually construct?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3860562\" data-originallang=\"en\">\u00c0 ce sujet, monsieur Orb, je vais maintenant vous poser une question.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3860563\" data-originallang=\"en\">Vous recommandez, entre autres, que le taux admissible pour les entrepreneurs priv\u00e9s concernant les secours en cas de catastrophe soit celui en vigueur. Je crois que nous le comprenons et que c'est normal. En m\u00eame temps, vous voulez que le gravier utilis\u00e9 \u2014 j'imagine qu'il est fourni par la municipalit\u00e9 \u2014 soit consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une d\u00e9pense remboursable. Encore une fois, dans la m\u00eame logique, quelle part de responsabilit\u00e9 doit revenir \u00e0 un partenariat public-priv\u00e9 en quelque sorte pour d\u00e9terminer comment nous organisons les secours en cas de catastrophe, de sorte qu'effectivement, le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral a une \u00e9norme responsabilit\u00e9 et nous sommes les chefs de file \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard, mais que nous avons aussi l'appui provincial et municipal, que tout le monde participe et donc, parce qu'ils ont des int\u00e9r\u00eats en jeu, nous avons des lois plus rigoureuses et r\u00e9alistes qui d\u00e9finissent nos m\u00e9thodes de construction?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/41-2/49/gerald-keddy-11/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/gerald-keddy/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1339/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8474007",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/41-2/49/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F41-2%2F49%2F"
}
}