This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2014-03-06 16:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Chungsen Leung (Willowdale, CPC)",
"fr": "M. Chungsen Leung (Willowdale, PCC)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"3622725\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thank you, Madam Chair.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622726\" data-originallang=\"en\">I wish to follow on my colleague Mr. Van Kesteren's line of thinking. To me, job creation and job matching are somehow separated in our economy. We train a lot of people and then we say they're on their own to go look for a job or the government can put its resources into job training and job creation.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622727\" data-originallang=\"en\">I also bring this back to other issues. We train a lot of very highly educated kids and what they end up doing is going to Japan, Korea, China to teach English. I often question the merit of this. Yes, it's broadening their experience, but when they come back they're still in the same hopper of saying, \u201cHow do I train myself for a proper job?\u201d </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622728\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Atherton or Mr. McGovern, perhaps you can shed some light on where government resources are best employed. Is it in the job matching aspect or in the job training aspect once it's matched? And what are the priorities in how we do that?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"3622725\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, madame la pr\u00e9sidente.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622726\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'aimerais poursuivre dans le sens des questions de mon coll\u00e8gue, M. Van Kesteren. \u00c0 mes yeux, la cr\u00e9ation d'emplois et le jumelage travailleur-emploi \u00e9voluent en quelque sorte sur des voies parall\u00e8les au sein de notre \u00e9conomie. D'une part, nous formons beaucoup de travailleurs en leur disant ensuite de se d\u00e9brouiller pour trouver un emploi et, d'autre part, le gouvernement peut investir dans la cr\u00e9ation d'emplois.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622727\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il y a aussi un lien \u00e0 faire avec d'autres enjeux. Beaucoup de jeunes Canadiens font de longues \u00e9tudes pour finir par enseigner l'anglais au Japon, en Cor\u00e9e ou en Chine. Je me demande souvent si le jeu en vaut la chandelle. C'est certes une exp\u00e9rience de plus \u00e0 leur actif, mais ils se retrouvent devant le m\u00eame questionnement \u00e0 leur retour: \u00ab Comment puis-je acqu\u00e9rir la formation n\u00e9cessaire pour trouver un emploi int\u00e9ressant? \u00bb</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"3622728\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur Atherton ou monsieur McGovern, peut-\u00eatre pourriez-vous nous aider \u00e0 mieux comprendre comment on peut optimiser l'utilisation des ressources gouvernementales. Est-ce pour le jumelage travailleur-emploi ou pour la formation une fois l'appariement effectu\u00e9? Quelles sont nos priorit\u00e9s dans ce processus?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/41-2/23/chungsen-leung-1/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/chungsen-leung/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4088/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "8268000",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/41-2/23/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F41-2%2F23%2F"
}
}