This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2012-05-31 16:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Rob Rainer",
"fr": "M. Rob Rainer"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2928774\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I will get back to you with some firm specifics on that. I will just briefly say that the chief actuarial officer, as you may be aware, has already spoken on this issue to say that there is no crisis in the old age security, that it's adequately supported, and that it is sustainable in its current form. We can get you the reference on that. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928775\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I'm going to come back to Mr. Jackson's point: this is an example of an issue that isn't just monetary, or even a monetary issue. There are so many substantive things in this bill that have nothing really to do with the budget or the economy. They have a lot to do with fundamental issues of human rights or of social development, and so forth. This is the kind of issue that deserves a far fairer hearing than what it's been given to date. To package it into a massive omnibus bill is a big mistake.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2928774\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais revenir avec des d\u00e9tails sur le sujet. Je dirai seulement bri\u00e8vement que l'actuaire en chef, comme vous le savez peut-\u00eatre, a d\u00e9j\u00e0 parl\u00e9 de cette question pour dire qu'il n'y a aucune crise relative \u00e0 la S\u00e9curit\u00e9 de la vieillesse, que le r\u00e9gime est bien financ\u00e9 et qu'il est viable dans sa forme actuelle. Nous pouvons vous obtenir la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928775\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais revenir sur l'id\u00e9e de M. Jackson: voil\u00e0 l'exemple d'une question qui n'est pas simplement mon\u00e9taire, pas m\u00eame du tout mon\u00e9taire. Il y a tant d'\u00e9l\u00e9ments substantiels dans le projet de loi qui, en fait, n'ont rien \u00e0 voir avec le budget ni l'\u00e9conomie. Ils se rattachent beaucoup \u00e0 des enjeux fondamentaux relatifs aux droits de la personne ou au d\u00e9veloppement social et \u00e0 ce genre de choses. Un examen beaucoup plus juste que celui qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 men\u00e9 jusqu'\u00e0 maintenant s'impose pour \u00e9tudier ce genre d'enjeux. Faire un projet de loi omnibus massif qui les englobe tous est une grosse erreur. </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/41-1/67/rob-rainer-4/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "7616417",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/41-1/67/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F41-1%2F67%2F"
}
}