This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2012-05-31 16:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Aurel Braun",
"fr": "M. Aurel Braun"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"2928801\" data-originallang=\"en\">I appreciate the question.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928802\" data-originallang=\"en\">I hope you read the Deloitte report, which did not cost $1 million. The report was actually devastating. I'm puzzled, as an academic, how you could read the report\u2014I'd like to assume you read the report\u2014and say this. The report basically stated that there was no accountability. The report stated that we have no way of tracing some of the money. The report stated, for example, that there was an internal audit report on the Geneva office that was negative, that was kept from the board. And then the late Mr. Beauregard commissioned another report that was submitted to the board, which was positive, but we were prevented from knowing about the negative report.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928803\" data-originallang=\"en\">This was all in the Deloitte report. I do not know how it would be possible to read through that report and come to the conclusion you have, with the greatest respect, sir.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"2928801\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci de votre question. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928802\" data-originallang=\"en\">J'esp\u00e8re que vous avez lu le rapport de Deloitte, qui, soit dit en passant, n'a pas co\u00fbt\u00e9 1 million de dollars \u00e0 produire. En fait, les conclusions du rapport \u00e9taient accablantes. En tant qu'universitaire, j'ai du mal \u00e0 comprendre comment vous pouvez tenir de tels propos apr\u00e8s avoir lu le rapport \u2014 j'aime \u00e0 croire que vous l'avez lu. Le rapport r\u00e9v\u00e9lait, pour l'essentiel, qu'il n'y avait eu aucune reddition de comptes. Il indique que nous n'avons aucun moyen de suivre la trace d'une partie des fonds. Par exemple, on y mentionne qu'un rapport de v\u00e9rification interne d\u00e9favorable sur le bureau de Gen\u00e8ve a \u00e9t\u00e9 cach\u00e9 au conseil et que M. Beauregard a demand\u00e9 un autre rapport, favorable cette fois-ci, lequel a \u00e9t\u00e9 remis au conseil, mais on nous a emp\u00each\u00e9s de prendre connaissance du rapport d\u00e9favorable. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"2928803\" data-originallang=\"en\">Toute cette information se trouve dans le rapport de Deloitte. Sauf votre respect, monsieur, j'ignore comment il serait possible de lire le rapport et d'en arriver \u00e0 la m\u00eame conclusion que vous. </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/finance/41-1/67/aurel-braun-13/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "7616453",
"document_url": "/committees/finance/41-1/67/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Ffinance%2F41-1%2F67%2F"
}
}