This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2025-10-06 11:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Gabriel Hardy",
"fr": "Gabriel Hardy"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"8917783\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Can privacy become a bit of a shield to avoid disclosing information that the public should know about some of our decisions? Do you think that this reason is currently being used by the government in certain situations, in the sense that it says it won't go any further because it's protected by privacy rules and principles, even though the situation is raising major questions among the public?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"8917783\" data-originallang=\"fr\">La protection de la vie priv\u00e9e peut-elle devenir un peu comme un bouclier pour \u00e9viter de d\u00e9voiler des renseignements que le public devrait conna\u00eetre relativement \u00e0 certaines de nos d\u00e9cisions? Pensez-vous que ce motif est utilis\u00e9 pr\u00e9sentement par le gouvernement dans des situations donn\u00e9es, en ce sens qu'il dit qu'il n'ira pas plus loin parce qu'il est prot\u00e9g\u00e9 par les r\u00e8gles et principes relatifs \u00e0 la vie priv\u00e9e, alors que la situation suscite un grand questionnement au sein de la population?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/45-1/7/gabriel-hardy-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/gabriel-hardy/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4710/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "13156990",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/45-1/7/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F45-1%2F7%2F"
}
}