This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2020-08-10 16:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Michael Barrett",
"fr": "M. Michael Barrett"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6256819\" data-originallang=\"en\"> In that case, would you say that once one becomes aware of the potential for a conflict or for the perception of a conflict, then in the list of steps that one can take\u2014avoidance, disclosure, removal\u2014have we now passed the point where we're able to avoid in that case? Is recusing oneself from a discussion at that point, once you've identified the conflict, the appropriate step to take in the list of steps that you outlined?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6256819\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Dans ce cas, diriez-vous qu'une fois qu'on s'est rendu compte de la possibilit\u00e9 d'un conflit ou de la perception d'un conflit, parmi la liste des mesures qui peuvent \u00eatre prises \u2014 l'\u00e9vitement, la divulgation, la r\u00e9cusation \u2014 est-il alors trop tard pour l'\u00e9viter? Est-ce que la r\u00e9cusation, une fois que vous vous \u00eates rendu compte du conflit, est alors la mesure \u00e0 prendre parmi la liste des mesures que vous avez d\u00e9crites?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/43-1/11/michael-barrett-10/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/michael-barrett/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4486/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10923004",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/43-1/11/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F43-1%2F11%2F"
}
}