This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-02-01 09:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252184\" data-originallang=\"en\">The short answer is yes. For the longer answer I would go back to the statistics in Europe: search engines and organizations have generally done an okay job, based simply on the fact that the vast majority of complaints to the data protection authority have led to a rejection. Ultimately, yes, it would come to the commissioner\u2014and really, ultimately, to the court\u2014to decide these issues.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252184\" data-originallang=\"en\">La r\u00e9ponse courte est oui. Pour vous donner une r\u00e9ponse plus \u00e9toff\u00e9e, j'aimerais rappeler les statistiques en Europe: les moteurs de recherche et les organismes ont g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement accompli un travail acceptable, tout simplement parce que la vaste majorit\u00e9 des plaintes formul\u00e9es \u00e0 l'autorit\u00e9 charg\u00e9e de la protection des donn\u00e9es ont \u00e9t\u00e9 rejet\u00e9es. En fin de compte, c'est au commissaire et vraiment au tribunal qu'il incomberait de prendre des d\u00e9cisions quant \u00e0 ces enjeux.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/daniel-therrien-32/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9939790",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F88%2F"
}
}