This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-02-01 09:25:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252158\" data-originallang=\"fr\">So, the person submits an access request under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. Some information may be denied for reasons of national security. I think we are talking about the application of the criteria in the current act. In that context, the threat to national or public security is one of the grounds for refusing access to information. I am talking about applying the law. First you have to ask whether the government has applied the exemption properly. That's the main question.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5252159\" data-originallang=\"fr\">If the individual concerned believes that the government did not apply the exemption correctly, he may submit a complaint to us and eventually obtain recourse to Federal Court. This then becomes a matter of fact, I believe. The issue is to determine whether the exemption was applied properly. </p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252158\" data-originallang=\"fr\">La personne fait donc une demande d'acc\u00e8s en vertu de la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels. Certains renseignements peuvent lui \u00eatre refus\u00e9s pour des raisons de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale. Je pense qu'il s'agit ici de l'application des crit\u00e8res de la loi actuelle. Dans ce contexte, le pr\u00e9judice \u00e0 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale ou publique est l'un des motifs d'exception pour refuse l'acc\u00e8s aux renseignements. On parle ici de l'application. Il faut donc se demander si le gouvernement a appliqu\u00e9 la dispense comme il se doit. C'est la principale question.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5252159\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Si l'individu croit que le gouvernement n'a pas appliqu\u00e9 la dispense correctement, il peut nous soumettre une plainte et, \u00e9ventuellement, obtenir un recours \u00e0 la Cour f\u00e9d\u00e9rale. Cela devient alors une question factuelle, je crois. Il s'agit d'\u00e9tablir si la dispense a \u00e9t\u00e9 bien appliqu\u00e9e.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/daniel-therrien-24/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9939680",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F88%2F"
}
}