This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-02-01 09:05:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252093\" data-originallang=\"en\">We can get back to you on the percentage, but I think it's fair to say that it was the vast majority. We received 28 submissions, essentially from experts and media companies, which were very helpful. It certainly made us focus long and hard on freedom of expression issues, but there's the broader public. We consulted not that long ago, before I determined the strategic priorities of the office in 2015. When I decided that reputation would be one of the four strategic priorities, this was based on what we heard from Canadians. Therefore, although most of the 28 experts, let's call them that, were against\u2014but not all; some were in favour of the right to de-indexing\u2014I think the broader population is concerned. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5252094\" data-originallang=\"en\">Now the broader population did not focus on the exact means, but did express serious concerns about their reputation.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5252093\" data-originallang=\"en\">Nous pourrons vous revenir avec un pourcentage exact, mais je peux affirmer sans me tromper que c'\u00e9tait la vaste majorit\u00e9. Nous avons re\u00e7u 28 m\u00e9moires, essentiellement d'experts et d'entreprises m\u00e9diatiques, et cela nous a beaucoup aid\u00e9s. Bien entendu, ces m\u00e9moires ont fait en sorte que nous nous sommes pench\u00e9s s\u00e9rieusement sur la question de la libert\u00e9 d'expression, mais il y a aussi le grand public. Nous avons men\u00e9 des consultations il n'y a pas si longtemps, soit avant que je ne fixe les priorit\u00e9s strat\u00e9giques du Commissariat, en 2015. Lorsque j'ai d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que la r\u00e9putation allait faire partie des quatre priorit\u00e9s strat\u00e9giques, je me suis bas\u00e9 sur ce que les Canadiens nous ont dit \u00e0 ce moment-l\u00e0. Bref, la majorit\u00e9 des 28 experts \u2014 appelons-les comme \u00e7a \u2014 \u00e9taient contre, mais pas tous. Certains ont plaid\u00e9 pour le droit au d\u00e9r\u00e9f\u00e9rencement. Je crois n\u00e9anmoins que c'est un enjeu qui pr\u00e9occupe le grand public. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5252094\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela dit, les membres du grand public n'ont pas insist\u00e9 sur les moyens proprement dits, mais ils ont tout de m\u00eame exprim\u00e9 de vives inqui\u00e9tudes en ce qui concerne leur r\u00e9putation.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/daniel-therrien-10/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9939481",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/88/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F88%2F"
}
}