This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2017-02-07 16:45:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Blaikie",
"fr": "M. Daniel Blaikie"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4753020\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'm curious to know from you, then, Mr. Linder, because you seem to be the only one here today with experience either receiving or disclosing information under SCISA, how is a disclosure or a receipt defined? Does that mean information on 70 individuals? How many people could be captured by any one disclosure or receipt of information under SCISA?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4753020\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je suis curieux de vous entendre, dans ce cas, monsieur Linder, parce que vous semblez \u00eatre le seul ici aujourd'hui \u00e0 avoir de l'exp\u00e9rience en ce qui a trait \u00e0 la r\u00e9ception et \u00e0 la communication d'information en vertu de la LCISC. Comment d\u00e9finit-on une communication ou une r\u00e9ception d'information? Est-ce que cela signifie que des informations concernant 70 personnes ont \u00e9t\u00e9 communiqu\u00e9es? Combien de personnes pourraient \u00eatre vis\u00e9es par une seule communication ou r\u00e9ception d'information au titre de la LCISC? </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/44/daniel-blaikie-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/daniel-blaikie/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4407/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9354652",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/44/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F44%2F"
}
}