This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2016-11-24 11:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Nathaniel Erskine-Smith",
"fr": "M. Nathaniel Erskine-Smith"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"4683354\" data-originallang=\"en\">Yes, although we had committee testimony with respect to that standard in the context of SCISA, and we had government agencies saying that disclosure on the basis of relevancy is important, but of course, there's the collection of the recipient agencies. It depends upon their mandate. CSIS has a \u201cstrictly necessary\u201d mandate, but other agencies don't in fact have that necessity standard as recipient agencies. There's probably a problem there if we don't heed the Privacy Commissioner's words and import the necessity standard across the board.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4683355\" data-originallang=\"en\">Speaking of mandates, again this gets to Justice No\u00ebl's decision, but we had Professors Forcese and Roach come before us and say that it's very important that we make crystal clear that receiving recipients must operate within their existing mandates and legal authorities, and that agencies put in place protocols for ensuring the reliability of shared information, as per the Arar commission recommendations. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4683356\" data-originallang=\"en\">I wonder, Ministers, if you would have something to say in response to the professors.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"4683354\" data-originallang=\"en\">Oui, bien que le comit\u00e9 ait re\u00e7u des t\u00e9moignages en ce qui concerne cette norme dans le contexte du LCISC et que des organismes gouvernementaux disent que la divulgation fond\u00e9e sur la pertinence est importante, mais bien s\u00fbr, il y a la collecte des organismes b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires. Cela d\u00e9pend de leur mandat. Le SCRS a un mandat \u00ab strictement n\u00e9cessaire \u00bb, mais d'autres organismes ne sont pas soumis \u00e0 cette norme en tant qu'organismes b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires. Il y a probablement l\u00e0 un probl\u00e8me si nous ne tenons pas compte des propos du commissaire \u00e0 la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e et si ce crit\u00e8re de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 n\u2019est pas adopt\u00e9 \u00e0 tous les niveaux.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4683355\" data-originallang=\"en\">En ce qui a trait aux mandats, cela revient \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision du juge No\u00ebl, mais nous avons entendu les professeurs Forcese et Roach nous dire qu'il est tr\u00e8s important de pr\u00e9ciser que les b\u00e9n\u00e9ficiaires doivent agir dans le cadre de leurs mandats et autorit\u00e9s juridiques actuels et que les agences doivent mettre en place des protocoles pour assurer la fiabilit\u00e9 de l'information partag\u00e9e, conform\u00e9ment aux recommandations de la commission Arar.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"4683356\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je me demande, chers ministres, si vous avez quelque chose \u00e0 dire en r\u00e9ponse aux professeurs.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/36/nathaniel-erskine-smith-2/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/nathaniel-erskine-smith/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4219/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "9261807",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/36/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F36%2F"
}
}