This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2019-01-31 16:20:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765670\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I agree. I totally support the principle of privacy by design. I would say this with regard to the fact that digitization is something that will necessarily happen\u2014that's true\u2014but privacy by design means that, again, the way in which we proceed needs to be thought out seriously and rigorously. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765671\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the issues to be considered is the role of the private sector in the delivery of services by government. You mentioned the wild west. You're well placed to know there are important problems with the way in which certain corporations are handling the personal data of individuals. Improving government services is being thought out in terms of relying on technology owned by the private sector in the delivery of services. That's fine, but the way in which these services will be delivered, calling on the private sector\u2014say, the Alexas of this world\u2014the government needs to be very careful as to how this will happen for many reasons, including who owns or controls the information that goes through Alexa when a citizen is asking for services from its government. What happens to that information? Is this information under public control or private control? Is it monetized or not? These are very important and fundamental questions.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765670\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je suis d'accord. Je suis tout \u00e0 fait en faveur du concept de la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e d\u00e8s la conception. Je dirais qu'il est vrai que la num\u00e9risation aura forc\u00e9ment lieu, mais la protection de la vie priv\u00e9e d\u00e8s la conception signifie que la fa\u00e7on dont nous proc\u00e9dons doit faire l'objet d'une s\u00e9rieuse et rigoureuse r\u00e9flexion.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765671\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il faut notamment tenir compte du r\u00f4le du secteur priv\u00e9 dans la prestation de services gouvernementaux. Vous avez parl\u00e9 du Far West. Vous \u00eates bien plac\u00e9 pour savoir qu'il existe d'importants probl\u00e8mes en ce qui a trait \u00e0 la fa\u00e7on dont certaines entreprises g\u00e8rent les renseignements personnels des gens. L'am\u00e9lioration des services gouvernementaux se fait gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 la technologie appartenant au secteur priv\u00e9 et qui est utilis\u00e9e pour la prestation de services. C'est tr\u00e8s bien, mais en ce qui a trait \u00e0 la prestation des services, par l'entremise du secteur priv\u00e9 \u2014 par exemple, \u00e0 l'aide des Alexa de ce monde \u2014 le gouvernement doit faire tr\u00e8s attention \u00e0 la fa\u00e7on dont cela se fera, et ce, pour de nombreuses raisons. Il doit notamment savoir \u00e0 qui appartient l'information transmise par Alexa, ou qui g\u00e8re cette information, lorsqu'un citoyen demande des services gouvernementaux. Qu'arrive-t-il \u00e0 cette information? Est-ce qu'elle est g\u00e9r\u00e9e par le gouvernement ou le secteur priv\u00e9? Est-ce qu'elle est mon\u00e9tis\u00e9e? Ce sont l\u00e0 des questions tr\u00e8s importantes et fondamentales.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/daniel-therrien-29/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10465200",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F133%2F"
}
}