This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2019-01-31 16:00:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765606\" data-originallang=\"en\">The situation you describe is exactly why I say it is essential to look very closely at the legal framework within which either data will be shared from one department to another, or a second department will be able to reuse data that the first department has \u00e0 la Estonia. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765607\" data-originallang=\"en\">It starts with the right legal framework, which limits the circumstances where a department calls on a citizen because another department has offered a service. That's extremely important. We have rules already in sections 4 to 8 of the Privacy Act. Yes, they can be reviewed, but it's not a bad place to start either. That's an important part of the foundation. Then I think the technology follows the principles that have been adopted with safeguards ensuring that, technologically speaking, data banks cannot talk to each other unless there's a legal authority to do that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765608\" data-originallang=\"en\">It starts with a well-defined and well-thought-out framework. Call it sharing. Call it reuse of information.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765606\" data-originallang=\"en\">La situation que vous d\u00e9crivez est exactement la raison pour laquelle je soutiens qu'il est essentiel d'examiner tr\u00e8s attentivement le cadre juridique dans lequel des donn\u00e9es seront \u00e9chang\u00e9es d'un minist\u00e8re \u00e0 l'autre ou dans lequel un minist\u00e8re sera en mesure de r\u00e9utiliser des donn\u00e9es recueillies par un autre minist\u00e8re, comme c'est le cas en Estonie.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765607\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela commence avec un cadre juridique appropri\u00e9 qui limite les circonstances dans lesquelles un minist\u00e8re peut communiquer avec un citoyen parce qu'un autre minist\u00e8re lui a offert un service. C'est extr\u00eamement important. Nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 des r\u00e8glements \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard dans les articles 4 \u00e0 8 de la Loi sur la protection des renseignements personnels. Oui, ces articles peuvent faire l'objet d'un examen, mais c'est aussi un bon endroit pour commencer. C'est une partie importante du fondement. Ensuite, je crois que la technologie suit les principes qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 adopt\u00e9s avec les mesures de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 n\u00e9cessaires pour veiller \u00e0 ce que, sur le plan technologique, les banques de donn\u00e9es ne puissent pas communiquer entre elles, \u00e0 moins qu'une loi les autorise \u00e0 le faire.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765608\" data-originallang=\"en\">Cela commence avec un cadre bien d\u00e9fini et bien con\u00e7u. On peut appeler cela un \u00e9change ou la r\u00e9utilisation de renseignements. </p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/daniel-therrien-16/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10464968",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F133%2F"
}
}