This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2019-01-31 15:50:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Daniel Therrien",
"fr": "M. Daniel Therrien"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765572\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'll put it in my terms.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765573\" data-originallang=\"en\"> I think the Estonian model is interesting in that the risk of digitized government services based on a common digital identifier, in the worst-case scenario, would be that the government, whether only the federal government or governments generally, would have a single profile of that individual. That is, of course, very difficult to reconcile with privacy. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765574\" data-originallang=\"en\">One of the apparent virtues of the Estonian model is that the data is not centralized. It continues to reside in a large number of institutions, and there's a technological pathway with appropriate legal authority authorizing the information to be reused from one department to another. The decentralized aspect of the Estonian model, I think, at first blush, seems a positive feature that reduces what would otherwise be a risk.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765575\" data-originallang=\"en\">You mentioned concerns that were expressed.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5765572\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais vous les pr\u00e9senter \u00e0 ma fa\u00e7on.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765573\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je pense que le mod\u00e8le estonien est int\u00e9ressant, car le risque des services gouvernementaux num\u00e9ris\u00e9s bas\u00e9s sur un identificateur num\u00e9rique commun serait que le gouvernement, que ce soit le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral ou les gouvernements en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, aurait un seul profil par personne. Il est alors tr\u00e8s difficile d'assurer la protection des renseignements personnels.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765574\" data-originallang=\"en\">L'un des avantages \u00e9vidents du mod\u00e8le estonien est que les donn\u00e9es ne sont pas centralis\u00e9es. Elles sont encore entre les mains d'un grand nombre d'institutions, et il y a une voie technologique avec des autorit\u00e9s judiciaires pertinentes qui autorisent que les renseignements soient r\u00e9utilis\u00e9s d'un minist\u00e8re \u00e0 un autre. La d\u00e9centralisation du mod\u00e8le estonien, \u00e0 premi\u00e8re vue, semble \u00eatre un aspect positif qui r\u00e9duit ce qui serait un risque autrement. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"5765575\" data-originallang=\"en\">Vous avez mentionn\u00e9 des pr\u00e9occupations qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 exprim\u00e9es.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/daniel-therrien-10/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10464857",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/133/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F133%2F"
}
}