This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2018-05-08 10:40:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Jacques Gourde",
"fr": "M. Jacques Gourde"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"5418934\" data-originallang=\"fr\">You said something interesting. Given how long the response times are, I'm wondering about cases where a complaint comes in a year after the information was initially requested and you know that it's going to be another five or six months before you get to the complaint. In those situations, are you able to check with the complainant to determine whether it's worth your while to review the file or whether you can simply close it to avoid unnecessary costs?</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"5418934\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Vous avez dit quelque chose d'int\u00e9ressant. \u00c9tant donn\u00e9 que les d\u00e9lais sont tellement longs, quand une plainte arrive un an apr\u00e8s la demande d'acc\u00e8s initiale et que vous savez qu'il va encore s'\u00e9couler encore cinq ou six mois avant que vous ne l'\u00e9tudiiez, y a-t-il moyen de v\u00e9rifier aupr\u00e8s du plaignant s'il vaut encore la peine de continuer \u00e0 travailler \u00e0 son dossier ou si vous fermez ce dernier imm\u00e9diatement pour ne pas engager de frais inutiles?</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/105/jacques-gourde-10/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/jacques-gourde/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4387/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "10115613",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/42-1/105/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F42-1%2F105%2F"
}
}