{"time": "2007-11-29 11:35:00", "attribution": {"en": "Mr. Sukh Dhaliwal (Newton\u2014North Delta, Lib.)", "fr": ""}, "content": {"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"806457\" data-originallang=\"en\">Thank you, Mr. Chair.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"806458\" data-originallang=\"en\">This is about a point of principle. Canadians want to know the truth, whether there is an abuse of public trust, and it is very important that we should listen to Mr. Schreiber.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"806459\" data-originallang=\"en\">He's here today. We should put questions of a general nature. If he can answer, he can answer yes or no. He can tell us that he will come back to these questions later. So I personally do not support this motion to adjourn this meeting, because we would like to continue with this meeting now.</p>", "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"806457\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, monsieur le pr\u00e9sident.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"806458\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il est question ici d'un principe. Les Canadiens veulent conna\u00eetre la v\u00e9rit\u00e9, savoir s'il y a eu abus de la confiance du public, et il est tr\u00e8s important que nous entendions M. Schreiber.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"806459\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Il est ici aujourd'hui. Nous devrions poser des questions de nature g\u00e9n\u00e9rale. S'il peut r\u00e9pondre, il peut r\u00e9pondre par oui ou par non. Il peut nous dire qu'il reviendra plus tard sur ces questions. Je n'appuie donc pas personnellement cette motion d'ajournement de la r\u00e9union, car nous aimerions poursuivre maintenant cette rencontre.</p>"}, "url": "/committees/ethics/39-2/5/sukh-dhaliwal-1/", "politician_url": "/politicians/sukh-dhaliwal/", "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/397/", "procedural": false, "source_id": "2232743", "document_url": "/committees/ethics/39-2/5/", "related": {"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F39-2%2F5%2F"}}