This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2007-02-13 10:30:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. David Tilson",
"fr": ""
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"454984\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Chairman, thank you.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454985\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Peterson has pretty well asked my question. I have to say I congratulate the police for the work they do on this issue, and your organization as well, Mr. Sullivan. I understand the frustrations that the police particularly have in making investigations because of the restrictions that are put against you, hindering your investigations. I understand that.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454986\" data-originallang=\"en\">I'm going to zero in on a question that has been pretty well asked several times. It's the issue of there not being a warrant, the lack of requirement for a warrant. I'd like to raise the issue of where there have been false accusations, abuse of process, oversight, and maybe there are other examples. The question was asked whether you had a proposed amendment, and I understand it's a tricky thing. We need all the help we can get, quite frankly.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454987\" data-originallang=\"en\">My question is to both Mr. Sullivan and Mr. Pecknold. If you're not going to have to have a warrant in restricted situations, should there be some threshold? Otherwise, and I'm not casting aspersions on anyone, there could be an abuse with this not requiring a warrant. I understand your frustrations, particularly the police, but it can be dangerous.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454988\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Pecknold.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"454984\" data-originallang=\"en\">Merci, monsieur le pr\u00e9sident.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454985\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ma question a \u00e9t\u00e9 tr\u00e8s bien pos\u00e9e par M. Peterson. Je f\u00e9licite la police pour le travail qu'elle accomplit sur ce plan ainsi que votre organisme, monsieur Sullivan. Je peux comprendre l'exasp\u00e9ration que la police \u00e9prouve lorsqu'elle enqu\u00eate \u00e0 cause des restrictions qui lui sont impos\u00e9es et qui entravent son action. Je le comprends.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454986\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je vais revenir sur une question qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 soulev\u00e9e \u00e0 plusieurs reprises. C'est la question de l'absence de mandat, le fait qu'un mandat n'est pas exig\u00e9. Il y a eu des cas de fausse accusation, d'abus de pouvoir et peut-\u00eatre y a-t-il d'autres exemples. On vous a demand\u00e9 si vous aviez un amendement \u00e0 proposer et je comprends qu'il est difficile de r\u00e9pondre \u00e0 cela. Nous avons besoin de toute l'aide possible.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454987\" data-originallang=\"en\">Ma question s'adresse \u00e0 la fois \u00e0 M. Sullivan et \u00e0 M. Pecknold. Si vous n'avez pas \u00e0 produire un mandat dans certaines circonstances pr\u00e9cises, faudrait-il \u00e9tablir certaines conditions? Autrement, sans vouloir critiquer qui que ce soit, cela risque d'entra\u00eener des abus. Je comprends votre exasp\u00e9ration, surtout dans le cas de la police, mais cela peut \u00eatre dangereux.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"454988\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur Pecknold.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/ethics/39-1/30/david-tilson-3/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/david-tilson/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1360/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "1896380",
"document_url": "/committees/ethics/39-1/30/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fethics%2F39-1%2F30%2F"
}
}