This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-05-26 19:00:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Mr. Dan Albas",
"fr": "M. Dan Albas"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6751564\" data-originallang=\"en\">First of all, look, putting this in order, which is substantially the same business that went on prior.... I'm not casting stones that I don't believe are warranted, but I can't believe we're entertaining this, for two reasons. First of all, there's the premise of it. The rules are done this way so there's certainty that everyone will have process, ensuring that if you fail on one measure, another party can't steal the same measure and then vote for it. Ms. May put in her amendment prior to the government. She was organized. She put it forward, and the government obviously thought at one point that it was a good idea. Again, that's how the process is.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6751565\" data-originallang=\"en\">I don't know if the NDP and the Liberals had some sort of plan here that they would vote it down. However, if they did side together to vote it down and they're playing the game, this is the natural result and they should know better.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6751566\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Chair, you've already said to everyone that we'll have to do this in the House of Commons later and hand over this\u2014</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6751564\" data-originallang=\"en\">Il nous faut d'abord mettre les choses en ordre, ce qui revient pour l'essentiel \u00e0 ce qui s'est pass\u00e9 avant... Sans qu'il soit justifi\u00e9 de jeter la pierre \u00e0 quiconque, j'ai du mal \u00e0 croire que nous envisagions de proc\u00e9der ainsi, et cela pour deux raisons. Tout d'abord, il y a une question de principe. Les r\u00e8gles sont telles que tout le monde puisse avoir voix au chapitre en sorte que, si la mesure propos\u00e9e par l'un est rejet\u00e9e, le suivant puisse la reprendre au bond et demander un vote sur cette m\u00eame mesure. Mme May a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 son amendement avant le gouvernement. Elle s'est organis\u00e9e de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 le pr\u00e9senter, et le gouvernement a manifestement pens\u00e9 que c'\u00e9tait une bonne id\u00e9e. Encore une fois, c'est ainsi que le processus fonctionne.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6751565\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je ne sais pas si le NPD et les lib\u00e9raux avaient pr\u00e9vu de rejeter l'amendement. Toutefois, s'ils se sont alli\u00e9s pour voter contre et qu'ils jouent le jeu, c'est le r\u00e9sultat naturel et ils devraient le savoir.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6751566\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, vous avez pr\u00e9venu tout le monde que nous devrons faire cela plus tard \u00e0 la Chambre des communes et remettre ceci...</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/environment/43-2/35/dan-albas-48/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/dan-albas/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4309/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11337886",
"document_url": "/committees/environment/43-2/35/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fenvironment%2F43-2%2F35%2F"
}
}