This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2021-05-19 15:35:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Dr. Laure Waridel (Co-Instigator, Eco-sociologist, Adjunct Professor at Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Montr\u00e9al, For our Kids Montreal, Mothers Step In)",
"fr": "Mme Laure Waridel (co-instigatrice, \u00e9cosociologue, professeure associ\u00e9e \u00e0 l'Universit\u00e9 du Qu\u00e9bec \u00e0 Montr\u00e9al, Pour nos enfants Montr\u00e9al, M\u00e8res au front)"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"6752827\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Thank you for your question, Ms. Michaud.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752828\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Thanks as well to all the members for their remarks.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752829\" data-originallang=\"fr\">You can see from a cursory consideration of the scientific news the extent to which humanity has come to a crossroads. The window is closing on the possibility for us to take action and prevent runaway climate change and all the known harmful consequences for the health and safety of populations. That's also what we've heard today.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752830\" data-originallang=\"fr\">We know that all the measures put in place to date have looked more like good intentions and haven't helped us meet greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. Starting now, all our decisions must be closely examined for the impact they may have on climate. When we say we're at a crossroads, that means we have to ask ourselves whether every decision, policy, regulation and tax measure will have the effect of reducing or increasing GHG emissions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752831\" data-originallang=\"fr\">That's the question that all federal government decision-makers should ask. As far as possible, we must then determine how that will affect relations with the provinces and various stakeholders, as well as the policies that are introduced in the provinces and all those who interact with the federal government. This seems essential because, as long as we have no such mechanisms, we'll keep saying we want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but will still subsidize the fossil energy sector, when we know it's the heart of the problem.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752832\" data-originallang=\"fr\">We're currently funding rising greenhouse gas emissions. Some $30 billion of public funds has been allocated to this sector since the pandemic began. We know the Trans Mountain project will cost more than $12.6 billion. A \"climate test\" would prevent us from heading in that direction and would encourage us instead to subsidize the people who depend on the fossil energy sector to encourage them to engage in the transition.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752833\" data-originallang=\"fr\">We must not abandon workers in the fossil energy sector. We must support the people of Alberta, Newfoundland and Saskatchewan. I think it's essential. We have to make this transition together, but from this moment on all our decisions must be closely examined to determine the impact they'll have on the climate and our children's future.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"6752827\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Je vous remercie de la question, madame Michaud.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752828\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Je remercie aussi tous les d\u00e9put\u00e9s de leurs interventions.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752829\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Quand on consulte le moindrement l'actualit\u00e9 scientifique, on constate \u00e0 quel point l'humanit\u00e9 est \u00e0 la crois\u00e9e des chemins. La fen\u00eatre se referme quant \u00e0 la possibilit\u00e9 d'agir et de pr\u00e9venir l'emballement climatique et toutes les cons\u00e9quences n\u00e9fastes que l'on conna\u00eet sur la sant\u00e9 et la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des populations. C'est aussi ce que nous avons entendu aujourd'hui.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752830\" data-originallang=\"fr\">On sait que toutes les mesures mises en place jusqu'\u00e0 maintenant ressemblaient davantage \u00e0 de bonnes intentions et qu'elles n'ont pas permis d'atteindre les cibles de r\u00e9duction des \u00e9missions de gaz \u00e0 effet de serre. Il faut que, \u00e0 partir de maintenant, toutes nos d\u00e9cisions soient pass\u00e9es au crible quant \u00e0 leurs r\u00e9percussions sur le climat. Quand on dit que l'on est \u00e0 la crois\u00e9e des chemins, cela veut dire qu'il faut se demander si chaque d\u00e9cision, politique, r\u00e9glementation ou mesure fiscale aura pour effet de r\u00e9duire ou d'augmenter les \u00e9missions de GES. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752831\" data-originallang=\"fr\">C'est la question qui devrait \u00eatre pos\u00e9e par tous ceux qui prennent des d\u00e9cisions au sein de l'appareil gouvernemental f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. Dans la mesure du possible, il faut par la suite d\u00e9terminer comment cela peut se transposer dans les relations avec les provinces et divers intervenants ainsi que dans les politiques qui sont appliqu\u00e9es aux provinces et \u00e0 tous ceux qui interagissent avec le gouvernement f\u00e9d\u00e9ral. Cela semble fondamental puisque, tant et aussi longtemps que nous n'aurons pas de tels m\u00e9canismes, on va continuer \u00e0 dire que l'on veut r\u00e9duire les \u00e9missions de gaz \u00e0 effet de serre, mais on va subventionner le secteur des \u00e9nergies fossiles, alors que l'on sait que c'est au c\u0153ur du probl\u00e8me. </p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752832\" data-originallang=\"fr\">En ce moment, on finance l'augmentation des \u00e9missions de gaz \u00e0 effet de serre. Depuis le d\u00e9but de la pand\u00e9mie, 30 milliards de dollars provenant de fonds publics ont \u00e9t\u00e9 accord\u00e9s \u00e0 ce secteur. On sait que le projet Trans Mountain va co\u00fbter plus de 12,6 milliards de dollars. Un \u00ab test climat \u00bb nous emp\u00eacherait d'aller dans cette direction et nous encouragerait plut\u00f4t \u00e0 subventionner les gens qui d\u00e9pendent du secteur des \u00e9nergies fossiles afin qu'ils s'engagent dans la transition.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"6752833\" data-originallang=\"fr\">Nous ne devons pas abandonner les travailleurs et les travailleuses du secteur des \u00e9nergies fossiles. Nous devons \u00eatre solidaires des gens de l'Alberta, de Terre-Neuve et de la Saskatchewan. Selon moi, c'est fondamental. Cette transition, nous devons la faire ensemble, mais il faut qu\u2019\u00e0 partir de maintenant, toutes nos d\u00e9cisions soient pass\u00e9es au crible quant \u00e0 leurs r\u00e9percussions sur le climat et sur l'avenir de nos enfants.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/environment/43-2/33/dr-laure-waridel-1/",
"politician_url": null,
"politician_membership_url": null,
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "11321672",
"document_url": "/committees/environment/43-2/33/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fenvironment%2F43-2%2F33%2F"
}
}