{"time": "2007-05-17 12:05:00", "attribution": {"en": "Mr. Nathan Cullen", "fr": ""}, "content": {"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"669647\" data-originallang=\"en\">Mr. Chair, if I may, if what Mr. Warawa just presented was relevant to the subject that you just accepted, then clearly we're talking about government's choices in spending. If they're going to spend $5 million on publicity, and are criticizing other governments on their spending, then clearly he can table a second document as well.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"669648\" data-originallang=\"en\">You've accepted this as relevant to our discussion today. Clearly, if the parliamentary secretary is interested in going down this path, then let's look at government spending.</p>", "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"669647\" data-originallang=\"en\">Monsieur le pr\u00e9sident, je vous interromps. Si ce que M. Warawa vient d\u2019affirmer concerne le sujet que vous venez d\u2019accepter, alors, il est clair que nous parlons des fa\u00e7ons de d\u00e9penser du gouvernement. S\u2019il s\u2019appr\u00eate \u00e0 d\u00e9penser cinq millions en publicit\u00e9, tout en critiquant les d\u00e9penses des autres gouvernements, il est \u00e9vident qu\u2019il peut d\u00e9poser un second document.</p>\n<p data-HoCid=\"669648\" data-originallang=\"en\"> Vous avez accept\u00e9 ce document en disant qu\u2019il \u00e9tait utile pour notre discussion d\u2019aujourd\u2019hui. Il est \u00e9vident que si le secr\u00e9taire parlementaire veut prendre cette direction, examinons les d\u00e9penses du gouvernement. </p>"}, "url": "/committees/environment/39-1/60/nathan-cullen-26/", "politician_url": "/politicians/nathan-cullen/", "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1287/", "procedural": false, "source_id": "2094640", "document_url": "/committees/environment/39-1/60/", "related": {"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fenvironment%2F39-1%2F60%2F"}}