This is a single speech (committee meeting) resource from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.

Content

Get this resource as raw JSON.

See the corresponding webpage.

{
    "time": "2008-03-05 16:10:00",
    "attribution": {
        "en": "Mr. Tom Lukiwski",
        "fr": ""
    },
    "content": {
        "en": "<p data-HoCid=\"972418\" data-originallang=\"en\">I don't know what the definition of consultations is, but would it be fair to say that you have a fairly good idea of each province's position on Senate reform? If that is an accurate statement, would it then be fair to say that the majority, if not all, of the provincial positions would be that there needs to be something other than the status quo, which would then allow this committee to go forward in that spirit, looking for alternatives to the status quo?</p>",
        "fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"972418\" data-originallang=\"en\">Je ne sais pas quelle d\u00e9finition on donne au terme \u00ab consultations \u00bb, mais peut-on dire que vous avez une assez bonne id\u00e9e de la position de chaque province au sujet de la r\u00e9forme du S\u00e9nat? Si c'est juste, pourrait-on alors dire que la majorit\u00e9 des provinces, sinon toutes, seraient d'avis qu'il faut autre chose que le statu quo, ce qui permettrait alors \u00e0 ce comit\u00e9 de faire des progr\u00e8s dans cette optique et de chercher des alternatives au statu quo?</p>"
    },
    "url": "/committees/bill-c-20-39-2/39-2/2/tom-lukiwski-2/",
    "politician_url": "/politicians/tom-lukiwski/",
    "politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/1534/",
    "procedural": false,
    "source_id": "2354858",
    "document_url": "/committees/bill-c-20-39-2/39-2/2/",
    "related": {
        "document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fbill-c-20-39-2%2F39-2%2F2%2F"
    }
}