This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
This is a single
speech (committee meeting) resource
from the openparliament.ca API. If you’re new here, you might want to look at the documentation. If API and JSON are gibberish to you, you’re better off at our main site.
{
"time": "2026-01-27 13:10:00",
"attribution": {
"en": "Sophie Chatel",
"fr": "Sophie Chatel"
},
"content": {
"en": "<p data-HoCid=\"9142777\" data-originallang=\"fr\">I know that the motion calls for a minimum of three meetings, but should we keep the minimum number of meetings to three, given the other priorities that were just added? We can talk about it at the next meeting and decide if we need a third meeting or if we're moving on to a different study.</p>",
"fr": "<p data-HoCid=\"9142777\" data-originallang=\"fr\"> Je sais que la motion demande un minimum de trois r\u00e9unions, mais devrions-nous garder ce minimum de trois r\u00e9unions, compte tenu des autres priorit\u00e9s qui viennent de s'ajouter? Nous pourrons en discuter et d\u00e9cider \u00e0 la prochaine r\u00e9union si nous avons besoin d'une troisi\u00e8me r\u00e9union ou si nous passons \u00e0 une \u00e9tude diff\u00e9rente.</p>"
},
"url": "/committees/agriculture/45-1/20/sophie-chatel-14/",
"politician_url": "/politicians/sophie-chatel/",
"politician_membership_url": "/politicians/memberships/4712/",
"procedural": false,
"source_id": "13317452",
"document_url": "/committees/agriculture/45-1/20/",
"related": {
"document_speeches_url": "/speeches/?document=%2Fcommittees%2Fagriculture%2F45-1%2F20%2F"
}
}